5 edition of Bangor Punta Operations Inc found in the catalog.
|Statement||Gale, U.S. Supreme Court Records|
|Publishers||Gale, U.S. Supreme Court Records|
|The Physical Object|
|Pagination||xvi, 130 p. :|
|Number of Pages||88|
nodata File Size: 7MB.
The series was first broadcast in 1949. When one person has wronged another in a matter within its jurisdiction, equity will spare no effort to redress the person injured, and will not Bangor Punta Operations Inc the wrongdoer to escape restitution to such person through any device or technicality.
Finally, it would permit the shareholders to reap a profit from wrongs done to others, thus encouraging further such speculation. what they did here is not the best accounting practice. But this is because of its desire to right wrongs, not because of a desire to punish all wrongdoers. This argument, which was not presented in the pleadings, in the Bangor Punta Operations Inc briefs nor during the taking of evidence, 2 is that the practical capacity method—even used correctly—is not appropriate for valuing taxpayer's inventory.
Anticipating renewed interest in World War II on the 50th anniversary of the war's end, Dastar released a video set entitled World War II Campaigns in Europe. Pecos County State Bank v. When it is disclosed that he has no standing in equity, the degree of wrongdoing of the defendant will not avail him.
And when it does so: 'A corporation and its stockholders are generally to be treated as separate entities.also a Maine corporation, is a wholly owned subsidiary of BAR. 28 These elementary principles of corporate law should control this case. But where there are minority shareholders, misappropriation and conversion of corporate assets injure their interests as well as the interest of the majority shareholder.
Availability: Items available for loan: Puey Ungphakorn Library, Rangsit Campus Call number: KPT504. North Street the building still exists. In computing rates for its "other indirect" expenses, however, taxpayer made another critical mistake.
Availability: Items available for loan: Pridi Banomyong Library Call number: DS489. 703, 714] of the Maine Public Utilities Act, Maine Rev. This is still but one of several factors which a court of equity should consider in determining whether the public interest would best be served by piercing the corporate veil in order to bar this action. Clark, 53 S. One of the most important of these was a design by William C.
Under this statute, plaintiff in a suit for refund has the heavy burden of proving that the government's assessment is arbitrary or an abuse of discretion.
78j band Rule 10b-5, 17 CFR 240. Black, supra, presented facts similar to the instant case.
It is settled law that the fiduciary duty owed by a controlling shareholder extends primarily to those who have a tangible interest in the corporation.
The complaint focused on four inter-company transactions which allegedly resulted in injury to BAR.
In 1971, BAR and its subsidiary filed the present action against Bangor Punta and its subsidiary in the United States District Court for the District of Maine.